会社
The company says a company, an unlimited partnership, a joint-stock company or a combination company in Japanese law. It is used as an equivalent of a similar concept (company in the U.K.) in the foreign law. This report describes the company form of each country equivalent to it as well as a company in the Japanese law. In existing company law, a company, an unlimited partnership, a joint-stock company, the four of the combination company are recognized as a kind of the companies (two lines of company law 1). The establishment of the corporation was recognized in a company, an unlimited partnership established in the second commercial law edition and limitedness company law established as well as a joint-stock company (in in older days, stock limited partnership) in 1938 conventionally, but the corporation was integrated with the company in new company law of the establishment (2005) in 2005. With it, the limited liability of the investor was secured, and a combination company was founded as the new company type that rules of the association were applied to about the inside relations of the company. In Japanese existing company law, I call a company, an unlimited partnership, a joint-stock company or a combination company the company (two lines of company law 1). But depending on a case there is a thing including the foreign company (by a definition). In addition, a foreign company is the foreign group of juridical person others which were established in accordance with foreign laws and ordinances and says a company and of a thing of the same kind or a thing resembling the company. When I put it before company law was enforced, the commercial law top was defined as "a commercial transaction sake business purpose establishment corporation", and Co., Ltd., the company was considered to be three kinds (before abolition of the stock limited partnership, four kinds including this) of a joint-stock company and the unlimited partnership. The thing (so-called non-trading company) which did not assume an eggplant the work watched a commercial transaction with a thing established in "a for-profit ヲ purpose corporation" by a rule of the second commercial law edition (a company) with a company, and the corporation was considered to be a company more in fact by limitedness company law. In the theory, I regarded the definition of the company as "a corporate judicial person for the purpose of the profit" after all. A point to be a corporate judicial person for the purpose of the profit is nominated for a property of the common property of the companies in the Japanese law. In the days of Meiji, the word of "the company" continued being used as an equivalent of English company, and it was used as an equivalent of the association = company concept (Luo societas, French soci t, German Gesellschaft) of the continental law. the old civil law property acquisition Chapter 6 "company" establish the rule of the company contract (a contract of partnership); the company of the civil affair purpose namely a non-trading company (an association in the civil law.) But I am big and am different from the new civil law at the present in the point that I can make a point, a juridical person limited to a for-profit business / occupation purpose. I did rules about) and entrusted a rule to the commercial law about the company of the business affairs purpose namely the business company (but the rule of the commercial law was done associate business of when I "shared capital to stocks" even if it was a non-trading company.) ). And I received this, and the commercial law established the rule of an unlimited partnership and the company as a company (a business company). After all the word of "the company" was used in the government bill in the new civil law of the establishment in 1896, but it was changed by the House of Representatives by "the association". A different word was used in this way to say "the association" of the civil law and "the company" of the commercial law. Because the principle of commercial transaction was adopted at first, in the commercial law top, it continues being limited a commercial transaction to a sake purpose and a thing (so-called business company) doing it as the work with the company, and a rule of the effect that I follow the rule of the company of the commercial law in civil law, and can establish a commercial purpose corporate judicial person (an unlimited partnership and a company) is put (so-called non-trading company), and that the rule of the non-trading company is put in the commercial law later, and it is treated as a merchant like a business company is clarified, and the rule of the non-trading company becomes delete at last by civil law, and the distinction that is a commercial transaction purpose in current company law is not put at all. There is a company of 3341000 companies (2008) except a company settling as of the end of October 2008, and I hit it, and a combination company is 14000 companies (except exception Ltd.) Co., Ltd. 85,000 joint-stock companies 18,000 unlimited partnerships 1,394,000, exception Ltd. 1,830,000. In addition, 101,981 establishment number of the company beat, and company 95,363 cases (93.5%), unlimited partnership 52 cases (0.0%), joint-stock company 490 cases (0.5%), combination company 6,076 were in (2007) for 2007 years (6.0%). It is a for-profit corporate judicial person, and the act to do for an act to do as the business and the business is done with a commercial transaction both. In addition, a mutual insurance company (an insurance method.) For a name "a mutual insurance company." Because) does not have a commercial purpose (distribution of the profit by the external profit activity, purpose at this point I am different from the foregoing. A thing most general with a company form in the United States of America is corporation…